Subscribe:
RSS feed
Procurement decisions don’t fail inside procurement. They fail when real-world conditions hit them. That’s what we assess.
Browsing All posts tagged under »Procurement Technology Failure Rate«
The Difference Between Longitudinal Depth and Dataset Size in Predicting Successful Initiative Outcomes
March 5, 2026
When it comes to dataset size versus longitudinal depth, "Broad tells you what exists. Deep tells you what works."
Now Available: The Coupa Software Consolidated Assessment Report
February 5, 2026
Coupa has been measured in every dimension except the one that matters most: will this implementation succeed in your organization?
The Governance Gap: Why Technology Always Outpaces Readiness
February 1, 2026
IBM's time crystals won't fix procurement's 50-80% failure rate by the end of 2026. The readiness gap that's persisted for 27 years explains why.
Making the Short List: Are the Magic Quadrant “Leaders” Really Leaders?
January 31, 2026
Why did 20 years of Magic Quadrants, Forrester Waves, and SolutionMaps fail to move the 50-80% implementation failure rate?
The COVID Success Spike: The Hansen Fit Score Link
January 31, 2026
Why did the COVID Spike improve practitioner outcomes?
Today’s Question: It’s Not a Competition of Design. It’s a Competition of Purpose.
January 28, 2026
How can you be a successful vendor if your clients are repeatedly failing?
20 Years of Quadrants, Waves, and Maps — Same 75-80% Failure Rate
January 25, 2026
Quadrants, Waves, and Solution Maps — all measuring technology capabilities, none measuring the right organizational readiness.
Procurement Insights 
If Phase 0™ and the Hansen Fit Score™ Are the Right Approach, Why Don’t the Big Firms Write About It?
March 23, 2026
0
What are the words Gartner — and every major analyst firm — want to speak, but can't?