Browsing All posts tagged under »technology«

I Am a Lousy Salesperson

February 28, 2026

0

Your success with ProcureTech, including AI, starts by asking questions nobody is asking.

From Kraljic to AWU: Why the Industry Keeps Building the Wrong Instrument for the Right Problem

February 28, 2026

0

Why is Salesforce recommending AI users eat Skittles for breakfast? Because Skittles are easy to count — and outcomes are not.

ISM Is Right — But Real Readiness Doesn’t Start Where They Think It Does

February 26, 2026

0

What does AI "talent readiness" have to do with technology?

Gartner Got the Sovereignty Question Half Right

February 26, 2026

0

Why infrastructure sovereignty alone can produce false confidence.

The C-Suite Sweep — Part 1 of 4: A Memo for the CIO

February 25, 2026

0

In 2010, I sat at a roundtable with the former CIO of the United States Government discussing transparency in procurement. In 2011, I taught procurement professionals to "act like a CIO." In 2025, the CIO's view of procurement evolved. The 80% failure rate didn't. Here is the question no vendor demo will answer.

When One Model Says Yes and Five Say Wait: Why Multimodel Validation Matters

February 24, 2026

0

Six models. One question. Five said "probable." One said "certain." The difference is where the credibility lives.

The Kraljic Paradox: When the Diagnosis Is Right but the Instrument Is Wrong

February 23, 2026

2

Kraljic described the world we model. We have built the instrument that his diagnosis deserved.

The Acquisition Aftermath: What Happens to Practitioners When Their Vendor Gets Acquired (And What To Do About It)

February 23, 2026

0

How do you, as a practitioner, better manage the ProcureTech M&A reality?

When the Dominant Advisory Firm Starts Asking Your Question

February 22, 2026

0

We published the measurement on February 14th. Eight days later, Gartner published the observation.

Scoring the Scorers: The Advisory Ecosystem’s Authority Paradox

February 22, 2026

0

Everyone tracks where vendors move on the Magic Quadrant. No one measures whether the Magic Quadrant itself works. We did.