One of the reasons why ApolloRise initially piqued my interest was their apparent deeper understanding of the Metaprise, Agent-based, and Strand Commonality models, as these are core elements of the Hansen Fit Score. As indicated in my response to Yurii Kapkov’s comment, I am rarely asked what should be a mandatory question by ProcureTech solution providers. The providers with whom I choose to work are either well-established organizations, ahead of the thinking curve, newer entrants, or a combination of both.
Yurii Kapkov, you are asking an excellent question that very few people think of, but should. However, you need to expand your scope.
Question 1: How is recalibration achieved if, after the practitioner and provider come together, neither engages directly with HFS Calibration Services?
Question 2: How is recalibration achieved if, after the practitioner and provider come together, only one party engages with HFS Calibration Services?
Question 3: What is the consolidation point for recalibration if the practitioner and provider come together and both engage with HFS Calibration Services?
In short, No Engagement, Single Party Engagement, and Dual Party Engagement.
I will address the first scenario here by saying, “Recalibration doesn’t require permission. It requires awareness. Drift shows itself where the strands no longer echo.” — Jon Hansen, Strand Variance and Organizational Tuning (2016)
If HFS Calibration Services is not directly engaged with either the practitioner client or the ProcureTech solution provider, HFS recalibration becomes a diagnostic exercise in inference, signal triangulation, and proxy modeling, rather than direct telemetry. While not ideal, it needs to be done to maintain our Master Scorecard.
EXTERNAL RECALIBRATION DIAGNOSTICS
Four Layers of Recalibration Without Telemetry:
30
Procurement Insights
Recalibrating The Hansen Fit Score After The Initial Engagement
Posted on July 17, 2025
0
One of the reasons why ApolloRise initially piqued my interest was their apparent deeper understanding of the Metaprise, Agent-based, and Strand Commonality models, as these are core elements of the Hansen Fit Score. As indicated in my response to Yurii Kapkov’s comment, I am rarely asked what should be a mandatory question by ProcureTech solution providers. The providers with whom I choose to work are either well-established organizations, ahead of the thinking curve, newer entrants, or a combination of both.
Yurii Kapkov, you are asking an excellent question that very few people think of, but should. However, you need to expand your scope.
Question 1: How is recalibration achieved if, after the practitioner and provider come together, neither engages directly with HFS Calibration Services?
Question 2: How is recalibration achieved if, after the practitioner and provider come together, only one party engages with HFS Calibration Services?
Question 3: What is the consolidation point for recalibration if the practitioner and provider come together and both engage with HFS Calibration Services?
In short, No Engagement, Single Party Engagement, and Dual Party Engagement.
I will address the first scenario here by saying, “Recalibration doesn’t require permission. It requires awareness. Drift shows itself where the strands no longer echo.” — Jon Hansen, Strand Variance and Organizational Tuning (2016)
If HFS Calibration Services is not directly engaged with either the practitioner client or the ProcureTech solution provider, HFS recalibration becomes a diagnostic exercise in inference, signal triangulation, and proxy modeling, rather than direct telemetry. While not ideal, it needs to be done to maintain our Master Scorecard.
EXTERNAL RECALIBRATION DIAGNOSTICS
Four Layers of Recalibration Without Telemetry:
30
Share this:
Related