“Our cognitive landscape is undergoing a seismic shift. We enter an era in which neither humans nor AI monopolize adaptability or learning. Instead, we find ourselves in a dynamic equilibrium where both forms of evolving intelligence—neuroplastic and technoplastic—continuously evolve.” – John Nosta, Techno-plasticity in the Age of Artificial Intelligence (Psychology Today)
AI mirrors the unique human ability of neuroplasticity.
The great thing about the dialogues regarding the various forms of Artificial intelligence in recent LinkedIn posts is that they are contextual checks and balances that allow us to respectfully challenge one another’s ideas while sharing our individual and collective experiences and insights.
The critical point of this exercise is that achieving consensus should never be the primary motive for your community engagement. Instead, you should actively seek out those individuals who agree and disagree with your position. In other words, don’t look to prove you are right through these exchanges, but honestly, seek to find out where you may be wrong.
With this in mind, I invite you to read the above Psychology Today article. If you are pressed for time, no worries; it is a short article.
I would then invite you to revisit the following Procurement Insights posts regarding human-led agent-based modeling and AI using the Psychology Today article as a filter or reference point. I would then like to hear what you think:
Today’s Takeaway Question: Why is active and productive co-existence between Humans and Artificial Intelligence important?
30
Procurement Insights
Human With AI, Not Human Versus AI
Posted on February 14, 2025
0
“Our cognitive landscape is undergoing a seismic shift. We enter an era in which neither humans nor AI monopolize adaptability or learning. Instead, we find ourselves in a dynamic equilibrium where both forms of evolving intelligence—neuroplastic and technoplastic—continuously evolve.” – John Nosta, Techno-plasticity in the Age of Artificial Intelligence (Psychology Today)
AI mirrors the unique human ability of neuroplasticity.
The great thing about the dialogues regarding the various forms of Artificial intelligence in recent LinkedIn posts is that they are contextual checks and balances that allow us to respectfully challenge one another’s ideas while sharing our individual and collective experiences and insights.
The critical point of this exercise is that achieving consensus should never be the primary motive for your community engagement. Instead, you should actively seek out those individuals who agree and disagree with your position. In other words, don’t look to prove you are right through these exchanges, but honestly, seek to find out where you may be wrong.
With this in mind, I invite you to read the above Psychology Today article. If you are pressed for time, no worries; it is a short article.
I would then invite you to revisit the following Procurement Insights posts regarding human-led agent-based modeling and AI using the Psychology Today article as a filter or reference point. I would then like to hear what you think:
Today’s Takeaway Question: Why is active and productive co-existence between Humans and Artificial Intelligence important?
30
Share this:
Related