The Relationship Between 1998 RAM’s Agent-Based Model And 2025’s Model Context Protocol (MCP)

Despite my 40-plus years in high-tech and procurement, I am always curious, so I value the insights I gain from the people in my extended community. Today’s post is inspired by a comment from Hervé Legenvre in one of my most recent LinkedIn posts.

How does a procurement professional use or interact with Model Context Protocol, and what improved outcomes does it achieve?

How Procurement Professionals Use or Interact with Model Context Protocol (MCP)

Procurement professionals interact with AI models that utilize Model Context Protocol (MCP) in various ways, especially within digital procurement platforms, supplier management systems, and spend analytics tools. MCP ensures that AI-driven procurement solutions retain, process, and apply relevant context to enhance decision-making and operational efficiency.

1. Smart Supplier Recommendations & Risk Analysis

• AI models track historical supplier interactions, contract performance, and risk factors to provide real-time recommendations.
• MCP ensures that previous supplier evaluations, compliance issues, and sustainability scores are factored into ongoing sourcing decisions.
• Improved Outcome: Procurement teams get context-aware supplier suggestions, reducing risk and improving supplier relationships.

2. Contextualized Spend Analysis & Cost Optimization

• AI models use MCP to remember previous spend categories, budget constraints, and organizational purchasing behavior.
• If a procurement professional inquires about cost-saving opportunities, the AI references historical transactions, benchmarks, and patterns to provide tailored insights.
• Improved Outcome: More accurate and personalized cost-reduction strategies, avoiding redundant spending.

3. Contract Lifecycle & Compliance Monitoring

• MCP helps AI track and reference contract clauses, renewal deadlines, and regulatory changes.
• If a procurement professional asks about contract risks, the AI retrieves and analyzes previous contract violations, terms, and compliance requirements.
• Improved Outcome: Proactive contract management, ensuring compliance and preventing costly penalties.

4. AI-Powered RFP & Bid Management

• When issuing an RFP (Request for Proposal), procurement professionals interact with AI that understands past procurement criteria and scoring methods.
• MCP ensures that AI remembers preferred bid evaluation metrics, supplier preferences, and prior negotiations.
• Improved Outcome: More efficient bid evaluations and negotiations, reducing manual effort and bias.

5. Automated Procurement Workflows & Approval Management

• MCP allows AI to remember approval hierarchies, preferred vendors, and spending thresholds.
• If an AI-driven procurement assistant automates purchase approvals, MCP ensures that organizational policies and past approvals are considered.
• Improved Outcome: Faster approvals, better compliance, and fewer bottlenecks in procurement workflows.

6. Dynamic Market Intelligence & External Data Integration

• AI models pull live market intelligence (e.g., pricing trends, geopolitical risks) and contextually compare it with internal procurement data.
• MCP ensures that AI remembers industry-specific risks and adapts procurement recommendations accordingly.
• Improved Outcome: More adaptive procurement strategies, helping organizations respond to supply chain disruptions.

Overall Benefits of MCP in Procurement

✅ Better Decision-Making – AI understands the context of past transactions, supplier relationships, and risk factors.
✅ Increased Efficiency – Automated workflows and approvals reduce administrative workload.
✅ Reduced Procurement Risk – AI proactively identifies compliance and supplier risks.
✅ Improved Cost Savings – AI-driven spend analysis and supplier recommendations optimize procurement budgets.
✅ Faster Response to Market Changes – AI dynamically adjusts procurement strategies based on real-time insights.

The above Model Context Protocol is another name for the human-led Agent-Based development and implementation model from the late 1990s. In short, it is a new name for a proven framework.

Watch the video below, and you will see what I mean:

The Relationship Between Model Context Protocol (MCP) and Jon W. Hansen’s Agent-Based Model (ABM)

The Model Context Protocol (MCP) and Jon W. Hansen’s Agent-Based Model (ABM) share a fundamental relationship in how AI-driven procurement solutions handle context, decision-making, and interactions within dynamic systems. While they are distinct concepts, they complement each other in AI-driven procurement, strategic sourcing, and market intelligence.

---

1. Understanding the Two Models

Model Context Protocol (MCP)

• MCP is a framework that allows AI to retain, process, and apply relevant context during interactions.
• It ensures that AI-powered procurement tools remember historical data, supplier behavior, contracts, and decision-making frameworks.
• MCP allows AI to learn from past procurement transactions, enforce policies, and provide contextual recommendations.

Jon W. Hansen’s Agent-Based Model (ABM)

• ABM in procurement, as discussed by Jon W. Hansen, models procurement behavior using autonomous agents (suppliers, buyers, regulators, etc.).
• Each agent operates based on defined rules, incentives, and learning mechanisms, creating emergent behaviors that help predict market trends, risk factors, and procurement inefficiencies.
• ABM helps simulate real-world procurement interactions, leading to better strategic sourcing, risk mitigation, and negotiation tactics.

---

2. How They Intersect in Procurement

Aspect	Model Context Protocol (MCP)	Jon W. Hansen’s Agent-Based Model (ABM)
Context Handling	Stores procurement history, contracts, and spend patterns	Uses behavioral modeling to predict procurement trends
Decision Making	AI-driven recommendations based on historical data and policies	Simulates market scenarios to optimize sourcing strategies
Adaptability	Adjusts procurement decisions in real time	Self-organizing agents adjust based on changing market conditions
Risk Mitigation	Monitors compliance, supplier risk, and fraud detection	Simulates disruptions and supply chain risks before they occur
Procurement Optimization	AI refines best practices based on historical learnings	Market-driven procurement strategy based on emergent agent behavior

---

3. MCP & ABM in AI-Driven Procurement

The synergy between MCP and ABM in procurement lies in how contextual learning (MCP) enhances agent-based simulations (ABM):

✅ Enhanced Supplier Negotiations:

• MCP remembers past supplier performance, pricing, and contract terms.
• ABM models supplier behaviors and adjusts negotiation strategies dynamically.

✅ Intelligent Market Adaptation:

• MCP enables procurement AI to track historical pricing trends.
• ABM simulates market dynamics and predicts future supply chain risks.

✅ Dynamic Procurement Strategies:

• MCP provides real-time procurement insights (e.g., compliance violations, cost overruns).
• ABM optimizes sourcing decisions by modeling procurement outcomes under various scenarios.

✅ AI-Driven Spend Optimization:

• MCP helps categorize and analyze past spend data.
• ABM simulates supplier competition to find the most cost-effective sourcing strategies.

---

4. Final Takeaway

MCP makes ABM more powerful by ensuring that procurement AI solutions retain context, learn from past transactions, and apply insights to real-world market simulations.
ABM, in turn, enhances MCP by modeling how autonomous procurement agents behave in complex ecosystems, creating a predictive framework for procurement professionals.

How does Jon Hansen’s 1998 RAM influence today’s Model Context Protocol?

Jon W. Hansen’s 1998 Relational Acquisition Model (RAM) was a pioneering procurement framework that integrated early agent-based AI to optimize Maintenance, Repair, and Operations (MRO) procurement. RAM’s design emphasized adaptability, interactive design, and early AI intelligence, leading to significant efficiency gains and cost reductions.

The Model Context Protocol (MCP), introduced by Anthropic in 2024, is an open standard that enables AI assistants to securely connect with various data sources and tools. MCP standardizes how AI models access and utilize external data, enhancing their ability to provide relevant and informed responses.

While RAM and MCP were developed in different eras with distinct objectives, there is a conceptual alignment between them:

• Agent-Based Interaction: RAM’s use of agent-based AI to manage procurement tasks parallels MCP’s framework, which allows AI systems to interact with external tools and resources in a structured manner.
• Contextual Decision-Making: Both RAM and MCP emphasize the importance of context in decision-making. RAM utilized relational data to inform procurement strategies, while MCP enables AI models to access relevant data sources, ensuring responses are contextually appropriate.

In summary, while Jon W. Hansen’s 1998 RAM did not directly influence the development of MCP, both share foundational principles in leveraging context and agent-based interactions to enhance AI-driven processes. RAM’s early adoption of these concepts in procurement may have contributed to the broader evolution of AI protocols like MCP, which seek to standardize and improve how AI systems interact with diverse data sources.

30