Which of the following consulting firms from highest to lowest number will have the biggest layoffs at the following positions – Entry Level Analyst, Research Teams, Design Teams
“The impact on traditional roles will be profound. Entry-level analysts will see their ranks reduced by 50-75% as AI takes over data crunching and problem structuring. Research teams are set to shrink by up to 95%, with AI generating faster, smarter insights for those who know the right questions to ask. Even design teams might face a 50% reduction as AI transforms how professional outputs are created.” – James O’Dowd, LinkedIn Post (Jan. 2025)
The ranking accounts for the 50-70% ProcureTech failure rate and economic uncertainty impacting consulting, per Hansen’s Metaprise model (Procurement Insights, 2025). Accenture leads due to its scale and prior large-scale cuts, while OC&C ranks lowest due to its boutique nature.
Evaluation Criteria
Firm Size and Headcount: Larger firms (e.g., Accenture, Big Four) have more employees, increasing absolute layoff numbers, per Glassdoor data (2023).
Recent Layoff History: 2023 cuts (e.g., Accenture’s 19,000, McKinsey’s 2,000) signal patterns, per Fortune (2023).
Economic Exposure: Firms reliant on tech or discretionary consulting (e.g., Accenture, BCG) face higher risks amid reduced IT spending, per SiliconANGLE (2023).
Role Vulnerability:
Entry Level Analyst: High turnover, cost-cutting targets, per Business Insider (2024).
Research Teams: Vulnerable in strategy firms (e.g., MBB) if demand slows, per Wall Street Oasis (2023).
Design Teams: At risk in digital-heavy firms (e.g., Accenture) due to tech pullbacks, per Dice (2023).
ProcureTech Stability: Firms with robust data cleansing (e.g., ORO Labs-like integration) may resist cuts by ensuring client value, per prior analyses.
Industry Trends: Consulting faces turnover and reduced allure, impacting junior roles, per Business Insider (2024).
Results
Rank
Firm
Est. Layoffs (2025)
Rationale
1
Accenture
5,000-10,000
Largest headcount, 2023 cuts (19K), tech exposure, high role vulnerability
2
Deloitte
3,000-7,000
Big Four, large analyst/design teams, tech risks, selective 2023 cuts
3
EY
2,000-5,000
Big Four, hiring reductions, moderate role exposure, diversified services
4
PwC
2,000-4,000
Big Four, rumored shifts, analyst/design risks, Strategy& exposure
5
KPMG
1,000-3,000
Smallest Big Four, 2023 cuts (700), narrower scope, moderate risks
6
McKinsey
500-1,000
MBB, 2023 cuts (2K), research team risks, prestige limits analyst cuts
7
BCG
400-800
MBB, rumored cuts, research exposure, up-or-out model, stable clients
8
Bain
300-600
Smallest MBB, selective exits, moderate research risks, resilient base
9
Oliver Wyman
100-300
Tier 2, small scale, financial services strength, low design exposure
Boutique, smallest headcount, niche focus, minimal role exposure
Insights
Accenture tops due to its 740,000 headcount and 2023 precedent (19,000 cuts), with analyst/design teams hit hardest by tech pullbacks, despite ORO Labs-like digital strengths.
Big Four (Deloitte, EY, PwC, KPMG) follow, with large workforces (~265,000-455,000) and entry-level/design vulnerabilities, cushioned by diversified services, per Business Insider (2024).
MBB (McKinsey, BCG, Bain) rank mid-tier, with smaller headcounts (~18,000-38,000) and research team risks, but prestige and Hansen-aligned stability (e.g., Anvil-like analytics) limit cuts.
Tier 2 (Oliver Wyman, Kearney) and OC&C rank lowest, with small headcounts (~500-6,000) and niche resilience, per PrepLounge (2025).
ProcureTech Context: Firms with robust data cleansing (e.g., ORO Labs’ GenAI, Anvil’s ML) resist cuts by ensuring client value, benefiting top firms, but scale drives absolute numbers.
Economic Drivers: Reduced IT spending and consulting’s waning allure (Business Insider, 2024) hit junior roles hardest, amplifying 50-70% failure risks without Hansen’s Metaprise resilience.
Limitations
No 2025 Data: Relies on 2023 trends (e.g., Accenture’s 19,000 cuts) and economic forecasts, per Fortune (2023).
Role Assumptions: Design teams smaller in boutiques (e.g., OC&C), research varies by firm (MBB vs. Big Four).
Estimation: Layoff numbers are projections (1-10% headcount), based on historical patterns and role exposure.
TODAY’S TAKEAWAY
While the above projected headcounts are considerably lower than James O’Dowd’s 50 to 95% layoff percentage, the one sure takeaway is that with the up to 80% ProcureTech initiative failure rates, the old consulting system was not working.
Which of the following consulting firms from highest to lowest number will have the biggest layoffs at the following positions – Entry Level Analyst, Research Teams, Design Teams
Posted on April 16, 2025
0
“The impact on traditional roles will be profound. Entry-level analysts will see their ranks reduced by 50-75% as AI takes over data crunching and problem structuring. Research teams are set to shrink by up to 95%, with AI generating faster, smarter insights for those who know the right questions to ask. Even design teams might face a 50% reduction as AI transforms how professional outputs are created.” – James O’Dowd, LinkedIn Post (Jan. 2025)
The ranking accounts for the 50-70% ProcureTech failure rate and economic uncertainty impacting consulting, per Hansen’s Metaprise model (Procurement Insights, 2025). Accenture leads due to its scale and prior large-scale cuts, while OC&C ranks lowest due to its boutique nature.
Evaluation Criteria
Results
Insights
Limitations
TODAY’S TAKEAWAY
While the above projected headcounts are considerably lower than James O’Dowd’s 50 to 95% layoff percentage, the one sure takeaway is that with the up to 80% ProcureTech initiative failure rates, the old consulting system was not working.
30
Share this:
Related