Where Do Traditional Analyst Frameworks End, And The Hansen Fit Score Framework Begin?

These three graphs—The ProcureTech Focus: Sales Orientation vs. Strategic Fit, Service Overlap Between HFS and Other Frameworks, and Hansen Fit Score Radar Chart —are essential for procurement practitioners and ProcureTech solution providers because they directly inform ROI realization, reduce change fatigue, and improve measurable KPIs like FTE reduction, COGS savings, and cycle-time performance.

This bar chart ranks major frameworks from most sales-oriented to most strategic-fit-oriented:

• Gartner and ProcureTech 100 are the most sales-driven, with scores near 90, emphasizing vendor positioning and market visibility.
• The Hansen Fit Score (HFS) is the most strategically aligned, scoring just 15—designed to match provider-practitioner fit based on internal dynamics, rather than vendor push.
• Spend Matters, Forrester, and KPMG strike a middle ground, leaning toward vendor enablement over tailored alignment.

ProcureTech Focus: Sales Orientation vs. Strategic Fit

Why It Matters

• Distinguishes solution providers that are sales-driven vs. those focused on long-term client success and alignment.
• Helps procurement teams avoid high-failure solutions driven by marketing hype, and focus on those that deliver sustained KPI gains.

Value to Practitioners
✅ Reduces change fatigue by avoiding “misfit” platforms
✅ Increases odds of solution longevity (measured by recalibration feasibility and strategic alignment)
✅ Improves value realization (savings, cycle-time, FTE optimization)

Value to Providers
✅ Encourages honest self-assessment: are we selling or aligning?
✅ Drives roadmap decisions toward fit, modularity, and recalibration enablement
✅ Improves success rates and referenceability across verticals

The above sidebar graph shows how much each major framework overlaps with the Hansen Fit Score (HFS) in terms of services and capabilities (on a 0–10 scale):

• Deloitte and McKinsey have the most overlap (score: 5), largely in advisory diagnostics and transformation frameworks.
• Hackett Group, KPMG, and Spend Matters exhibit moderate overlaps (scores: 3–4), particularly in areas such as benchmarks and post-mortem metrics.
• Gartner and ProcureTech 100 overlap the least (score: 2) due to their market visibility and vendor ranking focus rather than real-time recalibration or agent-level modeling.

Service Overlap: HFS vs. Other Frameworks (e.g., Gartner, McKinsey, Hackett)

Why It Matters

• Exposes blind spots in mainstream advisory frameworks where HFS fills the gap—especially in post-implementation recalibration, agent friction tracking, and real-world stakeholder alignment.
• Practitioners often rely on Gartner or McKinsey for benchmarking, but these don’t measure organizational readiness, change fatigue, or ROI durability.

Value to Practitioners
✅ Enables a more complete, hybrid advisory strategy
✅ Prevents over-reliance on frameworks that are product- or vendor-biased
✅ Illuminates when to deploy HFS recalibration over time vs. fixed assessments

Value to Providers
✅ Enables better partner strategy and integration alignment
✅ Supports internal team enablement to work with varied client metrics
✅ Identifies where to plug HFS into a client already working with a “Big 4” advisor

The above Radar Chart compares the Hansen Fit Score (HFS) against major frameworks:

• HFS scores a perfect 10 across all five categories.
• Deloitte and McKinsey show moderate-to-high alignment, particularly in ROI Projection and Custom Fit Modeling.
• Gartner and ProcureTech 100 fall short across all categories, indicating limited depth beyond vendor visibility.

Hansen Fit Score (HFS) Radar Chart

Why It Matters

• Visually demonstrates the depth of capability of HFS across key procurement transformation domains, including data readiness, stakeholder alignment, ROI forecasting, post-implementation recalibration, and more.
• Unlike most linear assessments, the radar chart emphasizes multi-dimensional fit—revealing where a solution excels or is weak relative to the organization’s real operating conditions.

Value to Practitioners
✅ Highlights alignment gaps before implementation
✅ Guides platform selection with long-term ROI in mind
✅ Predicts FTE impact, procurement maturity lift, and value delivery horizon

Value to Providers
✅ Reveals how their platform performs against real practitioner constraints
✅ Supports product development targeting fatigue-prone or low-fit zones
✅ Provides differentiated pre-sales storytelling focused on true strategic fit

TODAY’S TAKEAWAY

If your organization:

• Is fatigued or already live with a ProcureTech system → use Radar + Overlap Graphs
• Is selecting vendors or assessing market fit → prioritize Radar + Sales Fit Graphs
• Want to build a KPI dashboard → start with Radar Chart, then integrate feedback loops via Overlap insights

30