By Jon Hansen | Procurement Insights | March 2026
Someone spent tens of thousands of dollars running a paid ABM campaign directing named procurement decision-makers to a single Procurement Insights post. They did not call me. They did not subscribe. They just paid to route my 18-year archive voice through their sales funnel — for free. I only found out because I read my own traffic data.
Let me be clear about what that means.
Someone looked at that post and decided it was credible enough to influence CPO-level decisions — credible enough to spend real marketing dollars putting it in front of their target accounts.
That is not surprising. The archive exists for exactly that reason.
What is interesting is how it was used. Not as a reference. Not as a citation. But as a sales asset in a competitive campaign.
That creates a simple question.
If you already know the archive moves your audience — why access it indirectly?
What the Data Shows
The Procurement Insights archive tracks its traffic. UTM parameters are visible. Source and medium are identifiable. A paid contact-level ABM campaign — the kind that targets named decision-makers by individual rather than by account — shows up distinctly in the data. It showed up here.
The specific post that was amplified was a 2024 analysis of a major ProcureTech private equity acquisition and what it means for customers navigating uncertain waters. The campaign directed 318 targeted views from named procurement leaders to that post over its run.
I am not naming the advertiser. I do not need to. What matters is not who they are but what their decision reveals about the archive’s commercial credibility.
What I will say is this: the content they paid to amplify is available on this site for free. The deeper intelligence behind it — the HFS™ behavioral alignment score, the longitudinal arc, the Phase 0™ readiness implications — is available for a fraction of what was spent on the campaign. And unlike a single 2024 post, it is the complete, continuously updated arc.
That full signal did not exist in its current packaged form when the campaign ran. It does now.
The Shorter Path Has Always Been Here
For a fraction of what was spent on that campaign, you can now access the underlying analysis, the longitudinal data, and the assessment frameworks that actually drive those conclusions.
A single HFS™ vendor assessment delivers the full behavioral alignment arc — not a single post, but the complete longitudinal record across ownership changes, capital events, and product trajectory. That is the intelligence that moves CPO decisions. Not because a vendor paid to amplify it — but because 18 years of independent documentation built the credibility that makes it worth amplifying in the first place.
The archive will always remain independent. We are going to write about the market whether vendors engage or not. That principle has not changed since 2007 and will not change now.
But if you are using that work to influence commercial outcomes, there is a more efficient path — one that gives you access to the full signal, not just a single post.
What This Signals to the Market
This wasn’t traditional attribution. It was commercial application.
Someone identified that independent, longitudinal, practitioner-oriented analysis of ProcureTech vendor behavior carries more credibility with senior procurement leaders than their own marketing materials. So they paid a serious enterprise marketing platform to put it in front of named decision-makers at their target accounts.
That is the highest form of market validation. It means the work is not just being read — it is being used.
Not likes. Not comments. Not quadrant placements.
Budget allocation is the highest form of validation.
The archive is now being used by both buyers and vendors in live procurement decisions. That is what independent intelligence looks like when it enters the market. And it is a different category of intelligence than what any sponsored research or vendor-funded analyst report can claim — because the independence is structural, not declared.
You weren’t bypassed. You were validated without being monetized.
Now we fix that.
The Door Is Open
The Procurement Insights archive — 3,300+ documents, 18 years (and counting), no vendor sponsorships — is not going anywhere. The HFS™ assessment series, Phase 0™ Organizational Readiness Diagnostic, and RAM 2025™ validation framework are available through formal engagement.
If you are a vendor, consultant, or advisory firm that has been using Procurement Insights content in your campaigns, outreach, or client materials — the appropriate next step is a conversation.
Here is what direct engagement looks like:
- Individual HFS™ Vendor Assessment: $1,750 — the complete behavioral alignment arc, longitudinal evidence, and strategic commentary on where the platform sits in the market
- Annual Intelligence Subscription: $3,000 — unlimited access to all current and future assessments across the full ProcureTech ecosystem. This serves two distinct audiences: vendors who need to understand how the market sees them and their competitors before the next sales cycle, and practitioners who need the complete failure record — 18 years of documented initiatives, what went wrong, at what phase, and under what conditions — before committing to their next major technology decision. You will know what you are subscribing to. We will know who you are. The archive stays independent either way.
- 30-Minute Readiness Conversation: No charge — a preliminary discussion to identify which engagement fits your situation
Each of these represents a fraction of what a targeted ABM campaign costs — and delivers the complete signal rather than a single post snapshot.
If you are already investing to reach this audience, the more efficient path is direct access to the full signal and the support that comes with it.
→ Book your 30-Minute Readiness Conversation
⚡ Your Readiness Check
Here is how you use today’s insights to assess and apply this post’s core theme. It is an important starting point that is useful right now.
If you are a vendor, consultant, or advisory firm using third-party independent research in your sales or marketing campaigns, do this before your next campaign goes live:
1. Identify: Is any third-party independent research or analysis currently being used in your paid campaigns, outreach sequences, or client materials — without a formal licensing or engagement relationship with the source?
2. Check: What did that content cost you to amplify — in paid media, agency fees, or campaign management — versus what a direct engagement with the source would have cost?
3. Decide:
- Formal engagement → full signal, full context, full methodology
- Indirect use → partial signal, missing context, competitive risk
4. Act: The archive documents vendor behavior whether vendors engage or not. The question is whether that documentation works for you — or is used against you by a competitor who engaged directly.
If you are already investing to reach this audience, the full signal is available directly. The path has always been shorter than the one that routes around it.
This is what formal HFS™ assessment access looks like — the complete arc, not just the post. → procureinsights.com
Jon Hansen is the Founder of Hansen Models™ and the author of the Procurement Insights research archive, spanning 18 years and 3,300+ published documents. He has 42 years of experience in high-tech and procurement. The Hansen Fit Score™ (HFS™), Phase 0™ Organizational Readiness Diagnostic, and RAM 2025™ Multimodel Validation Framework are proprietary methodologies of Hansen Models™. Assessment services and organizational readiness diagnostics: procureinsights.com
Hansen Fit Score™ Vendor Assessment Series | Hansen Models™ (1001279896 Ontario Inc.) | © 2026
-30-
Procurement Insights
If You’re Paying to Promote My Content, Let’s Talk
Posted on March 19, 2026
0
By Jon Hansen | Procurement Insights | March 2026
Someone spent tens of thousands of dollars running a paid ABM campaign directing named procurement decision-makers to a single Procurement Insights post. They did not call me. They did not subscribe. They just paid to route my 18-year archive voice through their sales funnel — for free. I only found out because I read my own traffic data.
Let me be clear about what that means.
Someone looked at that post and decided it was credible enough to influence CPO-level decisions — credible enough to spend real marketing dollars putting it in front of their target accounts.
That is not surprising. The archive exists for exactly that reason.
What is interesting is how it was used. Not as a reference. Not as a citation. But as a sales asset in a competitive campaign.
That creates a simple question.
If you already know the archive moves your audience — why access it indirectly?
What the Data Shows
The Procurement Insights archive tracks its traffic. UTM parameters are visible. Source and medium are identifiable. A paid contact-level ABM campaign — the kind that targets named decision-makers by individual rather than by account — shows up distinctly in the data. It showed up here.
The specific post that was amplified was a 2024 analysis of a major ProcureTech private equity acquisition and what it means for customers navigating uncertain waters. The campaign directed 318 targeted views from named procurement leaders to that post over its run.
I am not naming the advertiser. I do not need to. What matters is not who they are but what their decision reveals about the archive’s commercial credibility.
What I will say is this: the content they paid to amplify is available on this site for free. The deeper intelligence behind it — the HFS™ behavioral alignment score, the longitudinal arc, the Phase 0™ readiness implications — is available for a fraction of what was spent on the campaign. And unlike a single 2024 post, it is the complete, continuously updated arc.
That full signal did not exist in its current packaged form when the campaign ran. It does now.
The Shorter Path Has Always Been Here
For a fraction of what was spent on that campaign, you can now access the underlying analysis, the longitudinal data, and the assessment frameworks that actually drive those conclusions.
A single HFS™ vendor assessment delivers the full behavioral alignment arc — not a single post, but the complete longitudinal record across ownership changes, capital events, and product trajectory. That is the intelligence that moves CPO decisions. Not because a vendor paid to amplify it — but because 18 years of independent documentation built the credibility that makes it worth amplifying in the first place.
The archive will always remain independent. We are going to write about the market whether vendors engage or not. That principle has not changed since 2007 and will not change now.
But if you are using that work to influence commercial outcomes, there is a more efficient path — one that gives you access to the full signal, not just a single post.
What This Signals to the Market
This wasn’t traditional attribution. It was commercial application.
Someone identified that independent, longitudinal, practitioner-oriented analysis of ProcureTech vendor behavior carries more credibility with senior procurement leaders than their own marketing materials. So they paid a serious enterprise marketing platform to put it in front of named decision-makers at their target accounts.
That is the highest form of market validation. It means the work is not just being read — it is being used.
Not likes. Not comments. Not quadrant placements.
Budget allocation is the highest form of validation.
The archive is now being used by both buyers and vendors in live procurement decisions. That is what independent intelligence looks like when it enters the market. And it is a different category of intelligence than what any sponsored research or vendor-funded analyst report can claim — because the independence is structural, not declared.
The Door Is Open
The Procurement Insights archive — 3,300+ documents, 18 years (and counting), no vendor sponsorships — is not going anywhere. The HFS™ assessment series, Phase 0™ Organizational Readiness Diagnostic, and RAM 2025™ validation framework are available through formal engagement.
If you are a vendor, consultant, or advisory firm that has been using Procurement Insights content in your campaigns, outreach, or client materials — the appropriate next step is a conversation.
Here is what direct engagement looks like:
Each of these represents a fraction of what a targeted ABM campaign costs — and delivers the complete signal rather than a single post snapshot.
If you are already investing to reach this audience, the more efficient path is direct access to the full signal and the support that comes with it.
→ Book your 30-Minute Readiness Conversation
⚡ Your Readiness Check
Here is how you use today’s insights to assess and apply this post’s core theme. It is an important starting point that is useful right now.
If you are a vendor, consultant, or advisory firm using third-party independent research in your sales or marketing campaigns, do this before your next campaign goes live:
1. Identify: Is any third-party independent research or analysis currently being used in your paid campaigns, outreach sequences, or client materials — without a formal licensing or engagement relationship with the source?
2. Check: What did that content cost you to amplify — in paid media, agency fees, or campaign management — versus what a direct engagement with the source would have cost?
3. Decide:
4. Act: The archive documents vendor behavior whether vendors engage or not. The question is whether that documentation works for you — or is used against you by a competitor who engaged directly.
This is what formal HFS™ assessment access looks like — the complete arc, not just the post. → procureinsights.com
Jon Hansen is the Founder of Hansen Models™ and the author of the Procurement Insights research archive, spanning 18 years and 3,300+ published documents. He has 42 years of experience in high-tech and procurement. The Hansen Fit Score™ (HFS™), Phase 0™ Organizational Readiness Diagnostic, and RAM 2025™ Multimodel Validation Framework are proprietary methodologies of Hansen Models™. Assessment services and organizational readiness diagnostics: procureinsights.com
Hansen Fit Score™ Vendor Assessment Series | Hansen Models™ (1001279896 Ontario Inc.) | © 2026
-30-
Share this:
Related