2024 EDITOR’s NOTE: There is a saying that “the more things change, the more they stay the same.” Let’s travel back to 2007 and then ahead to 2024. If we replace the word ERP with Generative AI, would the 2007 predictions by CAPS, ISM, and Kearney be any different today than they were back then?
In what was (and is) one of the most popular series in the Procurement Insights Blog’s history, the Dangerous Supply Chain Myths series was based on my review of the ISM, CAPS, and A.T. Kearney Report, which was originally released in May 2007.
Considered to be a breakthrough assessment of the purchasing industry at the time, I felt that there were several gaps in the study. What is important, and within the context of present-day realities, what do you think. Do the key areas highlighted in the study still carry weight in the here and now? If not, what has superseded them in terms of overall importance?
Whatever your thoughts, I am certain that you will find this series interesting.
August 23rd, 2011 – Epilogue (Response to Dangerous Supply Chain Myths series telling . . . especially Part 5 on talent attraction and retention)
August 22nd, 2011 – Part 7 (Dangerous Supply Chain Myths Revisited (Part 7): Enabling Technology – The Emergence of the Metaprise)
August 2oth, 2011 – Part 6 (Dangerous Supply Chain Myths Revisited (Part 6): Enablement of the Supply Management Organization – Balancing Capability with Control)
August 19th, 2011 – Part 5 (Dangerous Supply Chain Myths Revisited: Talent Attraction and Retention – An Exercise in Platitudes?)
August 18th, 2011 – Part 4 (Dangerous Supply Chain Myths Revisited: Internal & External Collaboration – A Desire versus Skill!)
August 17th, 2011 – Part 3 (Dangerous Supply Chain Myths Revisited: Multiple Supply Chain Networks – An Issue of Timing versus Concept Validity?)
August 16th, 2011 – Part 2 (Supplier Development and Management: The Fruit of a Poisonous Tree?)
August 15th, 2011 – Part 1 (The Myth of Consolidation)
30
Procurement Insights
Dangerous Supply Chain Myths Series (2007 to 2024)
Posted on July 8, 2024
0
2024 EDITOR’s NOTE: There is a saying that “the more things change, the more they stay the same.” Let’s travel back to 2007 and then ahead to 2024. If we replace the word ERP with Generative AI, would the 2007 predictions by CAPS, ISM, and Kearney be any different today than they were back then?
In what was (and is) one of the most popular series in the Procurement Insights Blog’s history, the Dangerous Supply Chain Myths series was based on my review of the ISM, CAPS, and A.T. Kearney Report, which was originally released in May 2007.
Considered to be a breakthrough assessment of the purchasing industry at the time, I felt that there were several gaps in the study. What is important, and within the context of present-day realities, what do you think. Do the key areas highlighted in the study still carry weight in the here and now? If not, what has superseded them in terms of overall importance?
Whatever your thoughts, I am certain that you will find this series interesting.
August 23rd, 2011 – Epilogue (Response to Dangerous Supply Chain Myths series telling . . . especially Part 5 on talent attraction and retention)
August 22nd, 2011 – Part 7 (Dangerous Supply Chain Myths Revisited (Part 7): Enabling Technology – The Emergence of the Metaprise)
August 2oth, 2011 – Part 6 (Dangerous Supply Chain Myths Revisited (Part 6): Enablement of the Supply Management Organization – Balancing Capability with Control)
August 19th, 2011 – Part 5 (Dangerous Supply Chain Myths Revisited: Talent Attraction and Retention – An Exercise in Platitudes?)
August 18th, 2011 – Part 4 (Dangerous Supply Chain Myths Revisited: Internal & External Collaboration – A Desire versus Skill!)
August 17th, 2011 – Part 3 (Dangerous Supply Chain Myths Revisited: Multiple Supply Chain Networks – An Issue of Timing versus Concept Validity?)
August 16th, 2011 – Part 2 (Supplier Development and Management: The Fruit of a Poisonous Tree?)
August 15th, 2011 – Part 1 (The Myth of Consolidation)
30
Share this:
Related