Gartner predicts that by 2027, 60% of organizations will fail to realize the expected value of their AI use cases due to incohesive ethical governance frameworks.
Learn how proactive CDAOs are prioritizing AI-ready data governance.
Ryan Backman, what you are talking about is the equivalent of a security guard starting a fire and then calling the fire department!
There is a lack of cohesive integration because Gartner has fuelled the flames of GenAI adoption urgency, resulting in the continued practice of leading with a technology equation-based implementation model, specifically a technology-process-people or process-technology-people framework.
For example, The Gartner Hype Cycle for Procurement and Sourcing Solutions – https://bit.ly/3XCLKRX
Or, as Subash Chandar pointed out in his comment on the David Shillingford post, the quote by Gartner’s Kaitlynn Sommers about “The window for building competitive advantage through early adoption of GenAI in procurement is narrowing.”
With what you are now saying about failed initiatives resulting from incohesive ethical governance frameworks, you are admitting that practitioners were not ready for the technology you were hyping.
Conversely, they would have been ready if an agent-based people-process-technology implementation model were utilized without the FUD you created.
Procurement Insights
Procurement didn’t start the fire, Gartner did?
Posted on September 12, 2024
0
Ryan Backman Senior Account Executive @ Gartner | Problem Solver | Quote EnthusiastSenior Account Executive
Book an appointment • 12 hours ago
Gartner predicts that by 2027, 60% of organizations will fail to realize the expected value of their AI use cases due to incohesive ethical governance frameworks.
Learn how proactive CDAOs are prioritizing AI-ready data governance.
Gartner for IT | hashtag#GartnerDA hashtag#AI hashtag#Data hashtag#Analytics
AI for Data Analytics: Focus on Where the Value Lies
gartner.com
Jon W. Hansen Strategic Advisor/Analyst Specializing in Emerging AI Tech, Sales and Marketing (Procurement) Thinkers360 Top 50 Global Thought Leaders & Influencers on Procurement! (April 2021)
now
Ryan Backman, what you are talking about is the equivalent of a security guard starting a fire and then calling the fire department!
There is a lack of cohesive integration because Gartner has fuelled the flames of GenAI adoption urgency, resulting in the continued practice of leading with a technology equation-based implementation model, specifically a technology-process-people or process-technology-people framework.
For example, The Gartner Hype Cycle for Procurement and Sourcing Solutions – https://bit.ly/3XCLKRX
Or, as Subash Chandar pointed out in his comment on the David Shillingford post, the quote by Gartner’s Kaitlynn Sommers about “The window for building competitive advantage through early adoption of GenAI in procurement is narrowing.”
With what you are now saying about failed initiatives resulting from incohesive ethical governance frameworks, you are admitting that practitioners were not ready for the technology you were hyping.
Conversely, they would have been ready if an agent-based people-process-technology implementation model were utilized without the FUD you created.
Here are two examples:
Virginia eVA – https://bit.ly/3SUWxml
DND – https://bit.ly/3FBnFRr
Michael Lamoureux David Loseby Rob Handfield
How Useful Is The Gartner Hype Cycle for Procurement and Sourcing SolutionsI have only one question left to ask? If Gartner was your barber, would you keep going back to
30
Share this:
Related