The Procurement Insights blog, including posts like “The GenAI Metaprise (Orchestration) and Operating System (Intake) Priority” (Oct 11, 2024), discusses AI’s role in procurement but doesn’t claim Agentic AI will replace humans. In fact, I emphasize AI as a tool for agility and stakeholder alignment, not a full substitute, aligning with my Metaprise model’s focus on decentralized, human-guided agents (2007 post).
No ProcureTech solution providers in 2025 explicitly state that Agentic AI—AI systems with autonomous decision-making and task execution—will outright replace humans in procurement. Instead, they position it as enhancing efficiency, automating repetitive tasks, and complementing human expertise, especially under pressures like the 2025 tariffs impacting coffee and cosmetics.
Below, I identify key ProcureTech providers and their stances on Agentic AI, focusing on whether they suggest human replacement or augmentation, grounded in industry trends and through my lens of practical procurement resilience.
ProcureTech Solution Providers and Agentic AI Stances
Agentic AI in procurement involves AI agents handling tasks like sourcing, contract management, and supplier coordination with minimal human oversight, often integrated into platforms like SAP or Coupa. The following providers are prominent in ProcureTech, with insights drawn from their 2025 activities and aligned with my focus on outcomes over hype.
- SAP:
- Agentic AI Role: SAP’s Joule AI in S/4HANA Cloud uses agentic capabilities for procurement tasks (e.g., supplier analysis, spend optimization), automating workflows like order approvals. It aims for 500+ AI skills by 2025, enhancing real-time decisions (Forbes, Jan 21, 2025). SIDE NOTE: What Self-learning algorithms are they using to analyze suppliers, e.g., historical and real-time?
- Human Replacement?: SAP emphasizes augmentation, not replacement. Joule frees procurement teams for strategic roles (e.g., tariff negotiations), handling 60% of routine tasks but requiring human oversight for complex decisions (e.g., cosmetics’ $0.07/unit savings).
- Cosmetics/Coffee Context: For Estée Lauder, SAP’s agents optimize Vietnam packaging ($0.22/unit vs. China’s $0.32), but humans verify quality. In coffee, they cap Brazil import hikes at 5–7% ($4.40/kg), per Focal Point’s tariff data.
- My View: I support SAP’s efficiency but caution against over-automation, favoring Metaprise’s human-agent balance for coffee farmer margins or cosmetics’ luxury needs (2024 post).
- Coupa Software:
- Agentic AI Role: Coupa’s AI-driven Business Spend Management platform automates sourcing, payments, and supplier tracking, recognized by Gartner for Source-to-Pay innovation. Its agents handle real-time spend analytics under tariff volatility (Emergen Research, Feb 1, 2024).
- Human Replacement?: Coupa positions AI as a “force multiplier,” automating repetitive tasks (e.g., invoice processing) to let humans focus on strategy. It claims 30% cycle time reductions but stresses human governance (The Hackett Group, CIO.com, Mar 24, 2025).
- Cosmetics/Coffee Context: Revlon’s $50–$100M EU gains use Coupa’s agents for supplier shifts (India’s $2/kg mica), but humans negotiate contracts. In coffee, Coupa limits retail hikes to $0.10–$0.20/lb, supporting my cost focus.
- My View: I endorse Coupa’s analytics but push Metaprise’s local agents to ensure coffee farmer fairness or cosmetics brand alignment (2014 post).
- Icertis:
- Agentic AI Role: Icertis’ Contract Intelligence platform uses AI agents for contract lifecycle management, automating compliance and supplier terms. In 2025, 90% of CPOs will explore such agents (Icertis ProcureCon Report, Jan 28, 2025).
- Human Replacement: Icertis views AI as collaborative, automating 80% of contract drafting but requiring humans for final approvals and ethics (e.g., tariff exemptions). It explicitly states that AI enhances, not replaces, procurement roles.
- Cosmetics/Coffee Context: Estée Lauder’s $200M tariff exemptions rely on Icertis’ agents with human validation. In coffee, agents secure $300M ASEAN exports, but farmers’ terms need human input.
- My View: I like Icertis’ targeted automation but stress Metaprise’s stakeholder focus to avoid generic contract risks (2009 post).
- GEP:
- Agentic AI Role: GEP’s SMART platform uses AI agents for sourcing, analytics, and risk management, claiming 30% efficiency gains in procurement cycles (CIO.com, Mar 24, 2025). It automates supplier performance tracking and order fulfillment. SIDE NOTE: As with my comment regarding SAP, what is the structure of their self-learning algorithms supplier performance tracking, e.g., historical and real-time?
- Human Replacement?: GEP’s Santosh Nair calls AI agents “decision-making partners,” not replacements, freeing humans for strategic tasks like supplier negotiations under tariffs. Agents handle data-heavy tasks, but humans set goals. SIDE NOTE: How do they measure accuracy using self-learning algorithms, including weighted importance outcomes?
- Cosmetics/Coffee Context: MAC’s $0.05–$0.10/unit savings (Mexico packaging) use GEP’s agents, with humans ensuring quality. In coffee, GEP mitigates $700M import costs, but farmers’ contracts need oversight.
- My View: I value GEP’s practicality but advocate Metaprise’s commodity-specific agents for cosmetics’ luxury or coffee’s smallholder needs (2024 post).
- Sievo:
- Agentic AI Role: Sievo’s procurement analytics platform uses agentic AI for spend visibility and ESG compliance, recognized by ProcureTech and Spend Matters. It automates data analysis and offers proactive recommendations (Sievo.com, Dec 22, 2024). SIDE NOTE: How do they use self-learning algorithms, including weighted importance outcomes for data analysis and proactive recommendations?
- Human Replacement: Sievo describes agentic AI as “augmenting decision-making,” not replacing humans. It automates insights (e.g., cost trends) but relies on humans for strategy and ethics, especially in tariff-driven markets.
- Cosmetics/Coffee Context: Revlon’s tariff cost caps ($0.02–$0.05/unit) benefit from Sievo’s analytics, but humans verify supplier shifts. In coffee, Sievo supports 5–10% demand retention, with human-led farmer deals.
- My View: I approve of Sievo’s data focus but push Metaprise’s decentralized agents for real-time tariff adaptability (2007 post).
GENERAL NOTATION: As far as I can tell, none of the five ProcureTech solution providers provide a tangible description or explanation of the learning loopback process for their self-learning algorithms, which is the most crucial component of an effective Human-Agentic AI Agent dynamic.
Industry Consensus And My Lens View
No ProcureTech provider claims Agentic AI will fully replace humans in 2025. Instead:
- Consensus: Providers like SAP, Coupa, Icertis, GEP, and Sievo see AI automating routine tasks (30–80% of workflows) to enhance human roles, not eliminate them. Gartner predicts 33% of enterprise apps will include agentic AI by 2028, but human oversight remains critical (CIO.com, Mar 24, 2025).
- Risks Highlighted: Over-automation could lead to errors (e.g., misaligned coffee farmer contracts) or ethical lapses (e.g., cosmetics’ sustainability). Providers stress human governance, echoing my caution against tech overreach (2024 comment).
- Cosmetics/Coffee Application: In cosmetics, AI agents cut tariff costs (5–12% for Estée Lauder, Revlon, MAC), but humans ensure brand fit (e.g., MAC’s $70/kg scents). In coffee, AI mitigates $0.10–$0.20/lb hikes, but farmers’ livelihoods need human advocacy, per Focal Point’s role.
I am in alignment with this augmentation view, as my Metaprise model prioritizes human-guided agents tailored to commodities (e.g., cosmetics’ mica, coffee’s beans). I would consider outright replacement narratives impractical, given procurement’s need for judgment under tariffs (2009, 2024 posts,).
Conclusion
No ProcureTech solution providers—SAP, Coupa, Icertis, GEP, or Sievo—indicate Agentic AI will replace humans in 2025.
They position it as automating routine procurement tasks (e.g., analytics, contracts) to boost efficiency (30–80% cycle reductions), freeing humans for strategic roles like tariff navigation or supplier ethics. In cosmetics, AI caps costs (e.g., Estée Lauder’s $0.07/unit savings), and in coffee, it limits hikes ($0.10–$0.20/lb), but human oversight ensures quality and fairness. My Metaprise model supports this, favoring augmentation over replacement to align with stakeholder needs (2024 post), especially for tariff-impacted industries.
As stated earlier the crucial missing element of all five providers is the continuous learning loopback process for their self-learning algorithms. Without this capability the true transformation of the human evolution to a strategic role using Agentic AI will be somewhat muted. In short, clean data is a continuous process that balances historic knowledge with dynamic real-time events to successfully predict the right course of action be it choosing the right supplier or buying strategy.
30
Procurement Insights
Which ProcureTech solution providers indicate Agentic AI will replace humans?
Posted on April 12, 2025
0
The Procurement Insights blog, including posts like “The GenAI Metaprise (Orchestration) and Operating System (Intake) Priority” (Oct 11, 2024), discusses AI’s role in procurement but doesn’t claim Agentic AI will replace humans. In fact, I emphasize AI as a tool for agility and stakeholder alignment, not a full substitute, aligning with my Metaprise model’s focus on decentralized, human-guided agents (2007 post).
No ProcureTech solution providers in 2025 explicitly state that Agentic AI—AI systems with autonomous decision-making and task execution—will outright replace humans in procurement. Instead, they position it as enhancing efficiency, automating repetitive tasks, and complementing human expertise, especially under pressures like the 2025 tariffs impacting coffee and cosmetics.
Below, I identify key ProcureTech providers and their stances on Agentic AI, focusing on whether they suggest human replacement or augmentation, grounded in industry trends and through my lens of practical procurement resilience.
ProcureTech Solution Providers and Agentic AI Stances
Agentic AI in procurement involves AI agents handling tasks like sourcing, contract management, and supplier coordination with minimal human oversight, often integrated into platforms like SAP or Coupa. The following providers are prominent in ProcureTech, with insights drawn from their 2025 activities and aligned with my focus on outcomes over hype.
GENERAL NOTATION: As far as I can tell, none of the five ProcureTech solution providers provide a tangible description or explanation of the learning loopback process for their self-learning algorithms, which is the most crucial component of an effective Human-Agentic AI Agent dynamic.
Industry Consensus And My Lens View
No ProcureTech provider claims Agentic AI will fully replace humans in 2025. Instead:
I am in alignment with this augmentation view, as my Metaprise model prioritizes human-guided agents tailored to commodities (e.g., cosmetics’ mica, coffee’s beans). I would consider outright replacement narratives impractical, given procurement’s need for judgment under tariffs (2009, 2024 posts,).
Conclusion
No ProcureTech solution providers—SAP, Coupa, Icertis, GEP, or Sievo—indicate Agentic AI will replace humans in 2025.
They position it as automating routine procurement tasks (e.g., analytics, contracts) to boost efficiency (30–80% cycle reductions), freeing humans for strategic roles like tariff navigation or supplier ethics. In cosmetics, AI caps costs (e.g., Estée Lauder’s $0.07/unit savings), and in coffee, it limits hikes ($0.10–$0.20/lb), but human oversight ensures quality and fairness. My Metaprise model supports this, favoring augmentation over replacement to align with stakeholder needs (2024 post), especially for tariff-impacted industries.
As stated earlier the crucial missing element of all five providers is the continuous learning loopback process for their self-learning algorithms. Without this capability the true transformation of the human evolution to a strategic role using Agentic AI will be somewhat muted. In short, clean data is a continuous process that balances historic knowledge with dynamic real-time events to successfully predict the right course of action be it choosing the right supplier or buying strategy.
30
Share this:
Related