Still Riding The AI Hype Train?

Posted on August 13, 2025

0


“And yes, Jason Busch has slowly come around, but is unfortunately still riding the AI hype train …
https://tinyurl.com/yw8pax4y” – Michael Lamoureux’s comment on previous post, August 13, 2025

Here’s a concise map of specific Spend Matters articles (2018–2025) to the closest Hansen pillarsMetaprise, Agent-based, and Strand Commonality — with a one-line “why it maps” for each.

Article-to-Pillar Map (2018–2025)


What this shows about the overlap with Hansen’s models

  • Metaprise (ecosystem orchestration across enterprises):
    Spend Matters’ arc from community intelligence (2018–2019) to network effects (2020) and the full Intake & Orchestration category (2023–2025) mirrors Metaprise’s core: an orchestration layer spanning teams, systems, suppliers, and networks. (Spend Matters)
  • Agent-based (autonomous assistants executing policy):
    Early hints in supplier discovery (2019) and the Community.ai launch (2022) evolve into explicit agentic AI by 2025—aligning to autonomous “agents” that guide/execute S2P work. (Spend Matters)
  • Strand Commonality (shared dependencies/strands across parties):
    The community narrative assumes common strands (suppliers, categories, risks, and ESG signals) that bind participants; this’s the basis for cross-customer benchmarks and alerts. (Spend Matters)

Net take

From 2018 to 2025, Spend Matters’ public coverage steadily converges on Hansen’s pillars: first by championing community/network data, then formalizing orchestration (I&O) as the operating fabric, and finally highlighting agentic AI on top of that fabric.

30

Posted in: Commentary