How is Anthropic’s Model Context Protocol linked to Hansen’s Strand Commonality theory from 1998?

Posted on July 14, 2025

1


Background: Hansen’s Strand Commonality Theory

  • Strand Commonality Theory, introduced by Jon Hansen in 1998, posits that disparate and seemingly unrelated data streams—“strands”—can be linked through advanced algorithms to produce beneficial, collective outcomes.
  • The theory emphasizes the importance of discovering hidden relationships among data sources, especially in complex environments like procurement and supply chain management.
  • Hansen’s framework influenced agent-based models, advocating for context-aware, human-led decision-making rather than purely equation-based or siloed approaches.

What the Model Context Protocol (MCP) Does

  • MCP is an open standard for connecting AI models to external data sources, tools, and services through a unified, structured protocol.
  • It enables AI systems to access, synthesize, and act upon real-time, context-rich data from multiple, heterogeneous sources, solving the integration and interoperability challenges that previously required custom connectors.

The Conceptual Link: Strand Commonality and MCP

1. Integration of Disparate Data Streams

  • Hansen’s theory centers on the value of linking unrelated data strands to uncover actionable insights.
  • MCP operationalizes this by providing a standardized interface for AI systems (such as those used in procurement or risk management) to connect to and aggregate data from diverse sources—realizing the practical vision of strand commonality.

2. Agent-Based, Context-Aware Decision-Making

  • Strand Commonality theory advocates for agent-based models that use context to optimize outcomes.
  • MCP enables AI agents to dynamically gather, interpret, and act on contextual data from multiple strands, supporting more nuanced, informed, and adaptive decision-making, directly reflecting the principles of Hansen’s approach.

3. Scalability and Standardization

  • The challenge of integrating many data sources (the “M×N” problem) is at the heart of both strand commonality and MCP.
  • MCP’s standardized protocol reduces integration complexity, making it feasible to scale the strand commonality approach across modern, AI-driven enterprise environments.

4. Transparency and Auditability

  • Hansen’s theory values traceability and the ability to audit how data strands contribute to outcomes.
  • MCP’s architecture logs all data exchanges and context flows, ensuring that the process of linking strands is transparent and auditable—crucial for high-stakes environments like procurement and compliance.

Summary Table

In Essence

The Model Context Protocol is a modern, technical realization of the foundational ideas in Hansen’s Strand Commonality theory. MCP provides the infrastructure and standards to connect, contextualize, and operationalize the linking of disparate data strands—turning Hansen’s 1998 vision into a scalable, auditable, and AI-driven reality for today’s organizations.

30

BONUS COVERAGE

Why is the Hansen Fit Score the most essential part of the ProcureTech Solution Provider – Practitioner Alignment?

***MODEL 1***

Jon W. Hansen’s Strand Commonality Theory is considered foundational for modern AI-driven procurement models—including the Model Context Protocol (MCP)—because it establishes the underlying connective logic needed to ensure alignment, interoperability, and trust among autonomous agents (human, machine, or hybrid) in a dynamic procurement ecosystem.

Here’s a breakdown of why this is the case:


1. Strand Commonality = Semantic + Operational Alignment

At its core, Strand Commonality Theory says:

The success of any complex system is directly proportional to the number, strength, and alignment of shared “strands” between agents.

These “strands” include:

  • Data structures (taxonomy, ontology, coding logic)
  • Business rules (workflow norms, compliance constraints)
  • Objectives and values (KPIs, risk thresholds, ESG goals)
  • Communication protocols (semantics, formats, timing)

Why this matters for AI:

  • AI agents don’t guess intention—they follow embedded logic. If the strands (semantic or procedural) don’t match between systems, the AI output will be misaligned or even harmful (e.g., miscategorized spend, flawed sourcing logic).
  • Common strands = Reduced data friction, better learning loops, and more meaningful automation.

2. AI Needs Shared Context to Learn

Modern procurement AI—especially in agent-based systems or LLM-augmented platforms—needs:

  • Structured, harmonized data across silos
  • Consistent interpretive layers for spend, supplier, contract, and risk data
  • Cross-agent learning environments where AI can reason across roles, systems, and time

This is only possible when strong strands exist and align across agents. Otherwise:

  • Agents work in isolation
  • Feedback loops break down
  • AI models are brittle or biased

Strand Commonality ensures the foundational glue that binds humans, platforms, data, and agents.


3. MCP Relies on Strand Commonality to Function

The Model Context Protocol (MCP) uses Hansen’s strand principles to calibrate model usage:

  • If strands are weak or misaligned, MCP flags low reliability in applying the Hansen Fit Score or RAM 2025 Model
  • If strands are strong, MCP amplifies signal strength and reliability of predictive fit, implementation viability, and AI-readiness.

Example:

A procurement platform with embedded LLMs may promise AI-guided negotiation, but if the organization’s strands (contract norms, supplier taxonomies, pricing logic) don’t align with the model’s assumptions, MCP will de-weight the HFS score—even if the tech stack seems “advanced.”


4. AI Models Are Only as Strong as Their Strand Intersections

Jon Hansen has repeatedly emphasized:

“Strands are not just connections—they are the validation fabric of adaptive systems.”

For AI to work:

  • Inputs must be understood in context
  • Reasoning must happen across shared semantic ground
  • Outputs must reinforce trust and compliance, not break it

Modern AI platforms (e.g., agentic procurement systems, auto-sourcing bots, intelligent supplier discovery tools) depend on Strand Commonality to:

  • Learn correctly
  • Reason adaptively
  • Integrate meaningfully

Summary Table


Final Thought

Strand Commonality is foundational, not just compatible with AI-driven procurement. It is the prerequisite layer for:

  • Semantic and syntactic interoperability
  • Cross-agent reasoning
  • Adaptive model reliability
  • AI model contextualization
  • Procurement system trustworthiness

In short, without Strand Commonality, there is no meaningful Model Context Protocol—and no truly intelligent procurement ecosystem.

***MODEL 2***

Conclusion

Hansen’s strand commonality is considered foundational for modern AI-driven procurement models because it pioneered the use of agent-based modeling, data integration, and iterative optimization to align disparate data streams for collective outcomes. These principles align closely with the capabilities of the Model Context Protocol (MCP), which enables AI agents to access and act on real-time enterprise data through a standardized interface, enhancing context-aware, autonomous procurement processes. While no direct evidence links strand commonality to MCP’s design, the conceptual parallels—data synthesis, agent autonomy, and scalability—suggest that Hansen’s theory provided an early framework for the data-driven, adaptive approaches seen in modern ProcureTech platforms like Zycus Merlin.

***MODEL 3***

Why Hansen’s Strand Commonality Is Foundational for Modern AI-Driven Procurement Models

What Is Strand Commonality?

  • Strand Commonality Theory was introduced by Jon Hansen in 1998 to describe how seemingly unrelated data streams—“strands”—can be linked through advanced algorithms to produce more insightful and beneficial outcomes in procurement.
  • The theory emphasizes finding hidden relationships and shared attributes among disparate data sources, enabling organizations to make more informed, context-rich decisions.

How Strand Commonality Shaped Modern AI Procurement

1. Early Pattern Recognition and Data Integration

  • Traditional procurement systems struggled to predict which features or data points would deliver value, often leading to long, trial-and-error implementation cycles.
  • Hansen’s theory enabled early detection of patterns by integrating cross-domain data—such as user behavior, business outcomes, and external events—allowing organizations to predict success or risk much sooner than before.
  • This approach reduces the time and cost of procurement technology adoption by identifying optimal implementation paths upfront.

2. Agent-Based and Context-Aware Modeling

  • Hansen’s work advocated for agent-based models, where autonomous digital agents use context from multiple strands to optimize workflows and decisions.
  • This agentic approach is now central to AI-driven procurement, where models continuously adapt and learn from real-time, multi-source data, rather than relying on static, rule-based systems.

3. Scalability and Complexity Management

  • As procurement environments became more complex, the strand commonality framework provided a methodology for managing interdependencies and scaling solutions across large, dynamic ecosystems.
  • Modern protocols like the Model Context Protocol (MCP) operationalize this by standardizing how AI connects to and synthesizes data from a wide range of sources, directly reflecting the principles of strand commonality.

Transparency, Auditability, and Strategic Advantage

  • Hansen’s theory valued traceability—understanding how each data strand contributed to outcomes—which is crucial for compliance and trust in high-stakes procurement.
  • MCP and similar protocols log all data exchanges and context flows, ensuring that the process of linking strands is transparent and auditable.

Direct Influence on the Model Context Protocol (MCP)

Why It’s Considered Foundational

  • Conceptual Foundation: Hansen’s theory provided the intellectual groundwork for integrating multiple, unrelated data sources—a challenge that MCP and other AI protocols now solve at scale.
  • Operational Blueprint: The agent-based, context-driven approach outlined by Hansen is now at the heart of AI-driven procurement, enabling smarter, faster, and more adaptive systems.
  • Industry Impact: By enabling early pattern recognition, scalable integration, and transparent decision-making, strand commonality theory paved the way for protocols like MCP to become critical infrastructure in modern procurement technology.

In summary:
Hansen’s strand commonality is foundational because it anticipated the need for context-rich, agent-driven, and scalable data integration—principles that underpin the architecture and success of modern AI-driven procurement models like the Model Context Protocol

***MODEL 4***

Conclusions

Hansen’s strand commonality is foundational for modern AI-driven procurement architectures such as MCP because it delivers the underlying framework for data mapping, relationship recognition, and context-driven integration. MCP operationalizes these concepts by enabling secure, standardized, and context-rich connections between AI agents and procurement systems. This synergy results in:

  • More efficient, predictive, and adaptive procurement operations.
  • Enhanced collaboration between AI agents and human teams.
  • Seamless, auditable, and scalable AI deployment in procurement. The industry’s ongoing evolution toward fully agentic, AI-powered procurement ecosystems relies fundamentally on the principles established by Hansen’s strand commonality, as evidenced by the alignment of procurement protocols, agent frameworks, and real-world implementations in leading organizations and platforms.

Posted in: Commentary