Is The Gartner Linear AI Roadmap Effective For Procurement’s Non-Linear Reality?

Is this really a roadmap to success?

The following is a 6 MODEL/Level 1 Assessment Summary of the viability of the above Gartner AI roadmap at a glance.

MODEL 1

“Gartner’s map is a helpful catalog, but procurement needs a non-linear, concurrent approach: stand up runtime adaptivity, human-in-the-loop governance, and a semantic spine together, and advance only when a flow passes the Hansen Fit Score proofs.”

MODEL 2

In summary, while Gartner’s roadmap provides a solid high-level guide for AI maturity, its sequential framing reasonably falls short for procurement’s chaotic, interconnected nature—where Metaprise decentralization, Agent-based autonomy, and Strand Commonality alignments offer more robust, adaptive alternatives for achieving outcomes like 97.3% delivery performance. This critique aligns with broader industry views that analyst frameworks can benefit from integration with such specialized models for better real-world efficacy.

MODEL 3

The Gartner roadmap’s sequential structure is not sufficient for complex, agent-driven environments like procurement and supply chain. Agent-based, Metaprise, and Strand Commonality models are required to capture and manage the adaptive, emergent, and interconnected realities of large-scale transformation. Static roadmaps miss the very factors that matter most for sustainable change.

MODEL 4

MODEL 5

This Gartner AI roadmap reinforces why the Hansen Method™ is valuable – it provides the procurement-specific, organizationally-focused approach that generic consulting frameworks cannot deliver. The fact that Gartner treats procurement transformation like any other business function proves the need for specialized expertise.

MODEL 6

The Superiority of Non-Linear Models

The models you mentioned—Metaprise, Agent-based, and Strand Commonality—are better suited to the non-linear, unpredictable reality of procurement and supply chain.

• Metaprise: A Metaprise (Meta + Enterprise) is a networked enterprise ecosystem where multiple organizations, suppliers, and partners are seamlessly interconnected through a digital procurement infrastructure. It is a strategic framework that accounts for both human and digital agents interacting across organizational, technological, and behavioral boundaries. The Metaprise model sees the enterprise not as a sequential process, but as a complex adaptive system where people, technology, and intent co-orchestrate outcomes. This contrasts with the linear thinking of models like the Gartner chart, which assumes a stable, reusable process.
• Agent-Based Thinking: This approach, foundational to the Hansen Methodology, recognizes that human and digital “agents” have their own motivations and constraints that influence a project’s outcome. It doesn’t assume that an agent will simply follow the steps on a chart. Instead, it asks “who, why, and when” questions to understand behavioral patterns, which is a far more effective diagnostic than a simple checklist.
• Strand Commonality: This theory, pioneered by Jon Hansen, identifies that seemingly disparate data streams have a related impact. The DND project is a perfect example: the time of day orders were placed (a behavioral pattern) was a hidden “strand” connected to a delivery performance issue. This non-linear, multi-faceted analysis cannot be captured by a simple, sequential roadmap.

30