For over two decades, procurement has struggled with the same unsolved challenge: technology-first transformation doesn’t work. AI didn’t fix it. GenAI didn’t fix it. AGI won’t fix it. Because the foundation of success has never been software — it has always been readiness.
Even the most sincere, intelligent leaders in our industry remain anchored in the equation-based model: the belief that the right platform can overcome organizational dysfunction. Not because they’re unaware of the issues, but because the structure of the industry pushes them there. Investors reward adoption speed, not governance maturity. Executives want transformation without disruption. Vendors are penalized for telling customers “you’re not ready.” Analysts built decades of frameworks around “solution-first” thinking.
It’s a system problem, not a leadership problem.
At the same time, the physics of transformation haven’t changed in 27 years:
Technology amplifies whatever foundation exists.
It doesn’t create one.
This has been validated continuously:
- The RAM and DND models (1998–2001) showed readiness predicts implementation outcomes.
- The 2008 CATA/SAP white paper showed ERP failure had nothing to do with software.
- The 2011 Metaprise framework predicted today’s AI challenges.
- Nadella’s 2014 “data culture” statement aligned with your thesis.
- Handfield, Redman, and Yacura’s research consistently showed data problems are behavioral, not technical.
- The Hansen Fit Score (2025) finally quantified readiness in a structured, measurable way.
The industry is now converging on the truth you documented decades ago.
Meanwhile, platforms like TealBook, as well as hyperscalers like Snowflake and AWS, provide essential value at the data layer. They reliably strengthen identity, hierarchy, sequence, and lineage. But they cannot fix the four internal issues that cause data to decay the moment it enters the enterprise:
- fractured taxonomies
- point-of-entry inconsistencies
- ownership gaps
- governance immaturity
This is not a deficiency of the platforms. It is simply the boundary of what technology can solve.
The solution is not to replace technology. It is to sequence it correctly.
That’s the honorable off-ramp:
Equation-Based (Old Model):
Technology → Transformation → Governance if needed
Agent-Based (New Model):
Readiness → Governance → Data → Technology → Acceleration
This shift doesn’t force platform providers to admit they were wrong. It lets them expand their value by aligning with readiness-first transformation.
It also protects them from being blamed for predictable failures.
It lets consultants evolve without losing face.
It allows CPOs and CIOs to pivot without signaling misjudgment.
It gives practitioners a stable foundation to succeed.
And it lowers failure rates for everyone.
With agentic AI and architecture-level intelligence accelerating every dysfunction they touch, the industry can no longer afford equation-based thinking. Platforms must sit on a prepared foundation, not serve as one.
This is the pathway forward:
Technology provides leverage.
Readiness determines the outcome.
That is the off-ramp the industry has needed — and it is available now.
-30-
THE BOUNDARY
Procurement Insights
The Honorable Off-Ramp: Why Even the Best Intentioned Leaders Stay Equation-Based — and How the Industry Can Finally Move Forward (EXECUTIVE VERSION)
Posted on December 3, 2025
0
For over two decades, procurement has struggled with the same unsolved challenge: technology-first transformation doesn’t work. AI didn’t fix it. GenAI didn’t fix it. AGI won’t fix it. Because the foundation of success has never been software — it has always been readiness.
Even the most sincere, intelligent leaders in our industry remain anchored in the equation-based model: the belief that the right platform can overcome organizational dysfunction. Not because they’re unaware of the issues, but because the structure of the industry pushes them there. Investors reward adoption speed, not governance maturity. Executives want transformation without disruption. Vendors are penalized for telling customers “you’re not ready.” Analysts built decades of frameworks around “solution-first” thinking.
It’s a system problem, not a leadership problem.
At the same time, the physics of transformation haven’t changed in 27 years:
Technology amplifies whatever foundation exists.
It doesn’t create one.
This has been validated continuously:
The industry is now converging on the truth you documented decades ago.
Meanwhile, platforms like TealBook, as well as hyperscalers like Snowflake and AWS, provide essential value at the data layer. They reliably strengthen identity, hierarchy, sequence, and lineage. But they cannot fix the four internal issues that cause data to decay the moment it enters the enterprise:
This is not a deficiency of the platforms. It is simply the boundary of what technology can solve.
The solution is not to replace technology. It is to sequence it correctly.
That’s the honorable off-ramp:
Equation-Based (Old Model):
Technology → Transformation → Governance if needed
Agent-Based (New Model):
Readiness → Governance → Data → Technology → Acceleration
This shift doesn’t force platform providers to admit they were wrong. It lets them expand their value by aligning with readiness-first transformation.
It also protects them from being blamed for predictable failures.
It lets consultants evolve without losing face.
It allows CPOs and CIOs to pivot without signaling misjudgment.
It gives practitioners a stable foundation to succeed.
And it lowers failure rates for everyone.
With agentic AI and architecture-level intelligence accelerating every dysfunction they touch, the industry can no longer afford equation-based thinking. Platforms must sit on a prepared foundation, not serve as one.
This is the pathway forward:
Technology provides leverage.
Readiness determines the outcome.
That is the off-ramp the industry has needed — and it is available now.
-30-
THE BOUNDARY
Share this:
Related