In every major transformation debate — data quality, AI readiness, governance maturity — the same pattern repeats:
Sincere, intelligent, well-intentioned leaders keep anchoring themselves to the equation-based model.
Not because they lack integrity.
Not because they don’t understand the problem.
And certainly not because they don’t care.
Stephany Lapierre is the perfect example. Her work building TealBook is driven by a genuine desire to fix the data challenges that have haunted procurement for decades. She’s articulate, committed, passionate, and deeply informed. When she describes the failures of enterprise supplier data, she’s not wrong.
But she — like many of the industry’s best — is operating inside a structure that has rewarded equation-based thinking for 20 years.
This article is not about her.
It’s about the system that keeps leaders like her stuck.
And more importantly: how to give every procurement executive an honorable, face-saving off-ramp into the next era.
1. The Structural Trap: Why Even the Best Leaders Stay Equation-Based
For two decades, SaaS economics created a gravitational pull toward a single, seductive promise:
“If you buy the right platform, success follows.”
This became the industry’s operating myth. And it shaped every incentive around it.
These five structural forces trapped everyone:
- Investor expectations that reward speed of adoption over quality of implementation.
- Procurement’s desire for a quick win in functions historically starved of investment.
- Vendor sales cycles that penalize telling the truth about readiness gaps.
- Executives conditioned to believe technology is transformation.
- A decade of analyst and consulting models built around “solution-first” roadmaps.
Inside this ecosystem, even highly ethical leaders face pressure to position technology as the starting point.
It’s not a moral failure.
It’s a structural inevitability.
**2. The Physics Have Never Changed:
Technology Amplifies Whatever Foundation Exists**
What the equation-based model ignored — and continues to ignore — is the simple transformation physics documented since 1998:
Technology amplifies whatever foundation exists.
It doesn’t create one.
This has been proven across:
- the 1998 SR&ED Strand Commonality work
- the 2001 DND platform implementation (97.3% delivery accuracy)
- the 2008 CATA Alliance SAP governance white paper
- the 2011 Metaprise model
- the 2021 “Twilight Zone of Data Uncertainty” post
- the 2025 Hansen Fit Score readiness assessments
And the industry, slowly and reluctantly, has begun to arrive at the same conclusions.
You can see the convergence visually:
Nadella said it in 2014:
“Data culture, not technology alone.”
Handfield reinforced it in 2018 and 2020:
“Governance is the base of the pyramid.”
“Data quality is not advancing.”
Hackett validated it in 2025:
“Readiness determines transformation success.”
The physics haven’t changed.
The industry is only now catching up.
3. Where TealBook Fits — and Where It Cannot Reach
TealBook solves an important problem:
establishing, enriching, and validating supplier identity.
This is a legitimate and valuable component of the data layer.
But no technology can substitute for the layers beneath it:
TealBook operates at the data layer.
What determines success lives at the governance and collaborative fluency layers.
This is not a limitation of TealBook.
It is a limitation of all technology.
Because readiness is not a software function.
It is a human, behavioral, structural function.
And this is where equation-based thinkers — even the sincere ones — hit the boundary.
4. The Honorable Off-Ramp: A Narrative Shift That Respects Everyone
Here is the path forward that lets every leader pivot without losing credibility:
Old Model (Equation-Based):
“Technology creates the foundation.”
New Model (Agent-Based):
“Technology accelerates transformation once the foundation is ready.”
This framing allows:
- platform vendors to embrace readiness without contradicting their product
- consultants to evolve their methodology without losing authority
- executives to protect past decisions while moving decisively into a new model
- practitioners to finally work in an environment aligned with transformation physics
The Hansen Fit Score doesn’t replace technology.
It de-risks it.
It prepares organizations to benefit from it.
It protects providers from being blamed for predictable failures.
It is not “us versus them.”
It is upstream + downstream = success.
5. Why This Matters Now
AGI, agentic workflows, and architecture-layer AI are about to rewrite the technology landscape.
Platforms will evolve.
Interfaces will disappear.
Data layers will consolidate.
But no AI agent will fix:
- fractured governance
- inconsistent process maturity
- cultural misalignment
- siloed ownership
- decision-making distrust
- absence of collaborative fluency
AI will expose those gaps.
HFS anticipates them.
The next era requires both sides:
- data-layer excellence (TealBook and others)
- readiness-layer governance (HFS)
This is the fusion point.
**Conclusion:
Everyone Gets to Move Forward Without Losing Face**
No one has to admit they were wrong.
They only have to acknowledge what the research, the archives, the implementations, and the physics have shown for 27 years:
Technology succeeds when readiness precedes it.
Not when it replaces it.
That is the honorable off-ramp the industry has been waiting for.
And it’s time we take it.
-30-
Procurement Insights
The Honorable Off-Ramp: Why Even the Best Intentioned Leaders Stay Equation-Based — and How the Industry Can Finally Move Forward (FULL VERSION)
Posted on December 3, 2025
0
In every major transformation debate — data quality, AI readiness, governance maturity — the same pattern repeats:
Sincere, intelligent, well-intentioned leaders keep anchoring themselves to the equation-based model.
Not because they lack integrity.
Not because they don’t understand the problem.
And certainly not because they don’t care.
Stephany Lapierre is the perfect example. Her work building TealBook is driven by a genuine desire to fix the data challenges that have haunted procurement for decades. She’s articulate, committed, passionate, and deeply informed. When she describes the failures of enterprise supplier data, she’s not wrong.
But she — like many of the industry’s best — is operating inside a structure that has rewarded equation-based thinking for 20 years.
This article is not about her.
It’s about the system that keeps leaders like her stuck.
And more importantly: how to give every procurement executive an honorable, face-saving off-ramp into the next era.
1. The Structural Trap: Why Even the Best Leaders Stay Equation-Based
For two decades, SaaS economics created a gravitational pull toward a single, seductive promise:
“If you buy the right platform, success follows.”
This became the industry’s operating myth. And it shaped every incentive around it.
These five structural forces trapped everyone:
Inside this ecosystem, even highly ethical leaders face pressure to position technology as the starting point.
It’s not a moral failure.
It’s a structural inevitability.
**2. The Physics Have Never Changed:
Technology Amplifies Whatever Foundation Exists**
What the equation-based model ignored — and continues to ignore — is the simple transformation physics documented since 1998:
This has been proven across:
And the industry, slowly and reluctantly, has begun to arrive at the same conclusions.
You can see the convergence visually:
Nadella said it in 2014:
“Data culture, not technology alone.”
Handfield reinforced it in 2018 and 2020:
“Governance is the base of the pyramid.”
“Data quality is not advancing.”
Hackett validated it in 2025:
“Readiness determines transformation success.”
The physics haven’t changed.
The industry is only now catching up.
3. Where TealBook Fits — and Where It Cannot Reach
TealBook solves an important problem:
establishing, enriching, and validating supplier identity.
This is a legitimate and valuable component of the data layer.
But no technology can substitute for the layers beneath it:
TealBook operates at the data layer.
What determines success lives at the governance and collaborative fluency layers.
This is not a limitation of TealBook.
It is a limitation of all technology.
Because readiness is not a software function.
It is a human, behavioral, structural function.
And this is where equation-based thinkers — even the sincere ones — hit the boundary.
4. The Honorable Off-Ramp: A Narrative Shift That Respects Everyone
Here is the path forward that lets every leader pivot without losing credibility:
Old Model (Equation-Based):
“Technology creates the foundation.”
New Model (Agent-Based):
“Technology accelerates transformation once the foundation is ready.”
This framing allows:
The Hansen Fit Score doesn’t replace technology.
It de-risks it.
It prepares organizations to benefit from it.
It protects providers from being blamed for predictable failures.
It is not “us versus them.”
It is upstream + downstream = success.
5. Why This Matters Now
AGI, agentic workflows, and architecture-layer AI are about to rewrite the technology landscape.
Platforms will evolve.
Interfaces will disappear.
Data layers will consolidate.
But no AI agent will fix:
AI will expose those gaps.
HFS anticipates them.
The next era requires both sides:
This is the fusion point.
**Conclusion:
Everyone Gets to Move Forward Without Losing Face**
No one has to admit they were wrong.
They only have to acknowledge what the research, the archives, the implementations, and the physics have shown for 27 years:
That is the honorable off-ramp the industry has been waiting for.
And it’s time we take it.
-30-
Share this:
Related